Reclaimed minelands could act as C sinks, but shallow soil, nutrient deficiency, and compaction could limit C accretion in these ecosystems. This study evaluated the impact of topsoil application techniques on total C storage (tree biomass and soil organic C [SOC]) in 15‐yr‐old experimental plots established on reclaimed land in southeastern Ohio. Treatments included topsoil (graded overburden [OV] and standard [ST] and ripped topsoil [RT]) and P fertilization (0 and 2.24 Mg ha −1 of rock phosphate). One half of each plot was planted with Austrian pine ( Pinus nigra J.F. Arnold ssp. nigra ) and the other half with green ash ( Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marshall). A significant effect of topsoil application on tree growth and SOC was noted. In green ash plots, aboveground biomass was always <3.4 Mg C ha −1 , but in Austrian pine stands it averaged 10.3, 15.2, and 2.1 Mg C ha −1 in the ST, RT, and OV plots, respectively. The pool of recent SOC (after discounting geogenic C) was in the order: ST (34.9 Mg C ha −1 ) > RT (29.8 Mg C ha −1 ) > OV (17.8 Mg C ha −1 ). The lower SOC in RT than in ST plots was attributed to enhanced C mineralization by soil ripping, but with the fast‐growing Austrian pine, this SOC deficit was compensated by a greater (by 4.9 Mg C ha −1 ) standing tree biomass in the RT plots, resulting in comparable total C storage with either ST or CT. With the slow‐growing green ash, however, total C storage was significantly lower in RT (27.9 Mg C ha −1 ) than in ST (37.4 Mg C ha −1 ) plots. Thus, the impact of topsoil application technique on C storage in these aggrading ecosystems is largely determined by tree growth and productivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacinthe et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: