Firms have two motivations for issuing convertible debt. Some issue convertible debt instead of straight debt to mitigate the costs of bondholder/stockholder agency conflicts. Others issue convertible debt instead of common debt to reduce the costs of adverse selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lewis et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: