Housed pigs and domestic fowl are exposed chronically to atmospheric ammonia at concentrations that mayexceed 30 ppm in buildings with poor environmental control. While the effects of ammonia on animal performance and healthare reasonably well understood, the effects on behavior are not. In a series of experiments, we therefore studied the aversionof weaner pigs, broiler chickens, and adult laying hens to atmospheric ammonia in a choice test. Typically, individual or smallgroups of animals were kept in a multicompartment exposure chamber for one or two weeks. The physical environment inall eight compartments of the chamber was identical in all respects but one: the concentration of atmospheric ammonia wasset at approximately 0, 10, 20, or 40 ppm. Observations of the animals location and behavior were used to indicate theiraversion to ammonia. Both pigs and domestic fowl (of both strains) significantly preferred fresh air (approximately 0 ppm)to an ammoniated atmosphere. Visit duration and frequency declined with increasing ammonia concentrations, althoughinterestingly, both species showed a delayed avoidance of ammonia, perhaps indicative of a sense of malaise, which was onlymanifested after about 30 to 60 min. When given a forced choice between thermal comfort and access to fresh air,coldstressed pigs chose the former over the latter. Overall, pigs and fowl did not always make shortterm choices that werenecessarily in their longterm interests. Further work is in hand to study the strength of this aversion in fowl. Currentrecommendations for air quality in pig and poultry houses should be revised to take account of the animals strong preferencefor fresh air; our findings indicate limited tolerance of ammonia at concentrations typical of current housing systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wathes et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: