AIMS: The following polymers were developed: polyethylene (PE), a PE and polyethylene oxide (70% PE and 30% PEO; PE + PEO) blend, PE and nisin (PE + nisin), PE, nisin, and EDTA (PE + nisin + EDTA), and PE + PEO with nisin (PE + PEO + nisin). METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the polymers tested, PE and PE + PEO did not exhibit any antimicrobial activity against Brochothrix thermosphacta (BT); however, PE + nisin, PE + nisin + EDTA, and PE + PEO + nisin did. Beef surfaces were experimentally inoculated with 3.50 log10 cfu/cm2 of BT, vacuum packaged with each of the five polymers, and held at 4 degrees C for 21 d. After 3 d at 4 degrees C, BT was reduced > 1.70 log(10) by PE + nisin and > 3.50 log(10) with PE + nisin + EDTA or PE + PEO + nisin. By 21 d at 4 degrees C, BT was reduced to 0.30 log(10) cfu/cm(2) when treated with PE + PEO + nisin. CONCLUSION: It appears that PE + PEO + nisin or PE + nisin + EDTA were more effective for reducing BT, as compared to polymers composed of PE + nisin. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Nisin-incorporated polymers may control the growth of undesirable bacteria, thereby extending the shelf life and possibly enhancing the microbial safety of meats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cutter et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: