Key result
Solid cancer was associated with a significantly increased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism at 3 months compared to no malignancy in patients receiving vitamin K antagonists (adjusted HR 3.5).
Why the study?
Does oral anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists increase the risk of recurrent VTE and major bleeding in patients with solid cancer compared to patients without malignancy?
Population
12,744 patients with symptomatic, acute DVT or PE confirmed by objective tests, who had an initial treatment…
Comparison
Oral anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K… vs Oral anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
3 months
Authors
Loading...
Supports caution with VKA for VTE in solid cancer; leaves open LMWH superiority in prospective trials.
Cohort (n=12,744)
Yes
Does oral anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists increase the risk of recurrent VTE and major bleeding in patients with solid cancer compared to patients without malignancy?
Hazard Ratio: 3.5 (95% CI 2.5–4.7)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.2% vs 1.4%
Cancer patients treated with vitamin K antagonists for VTE have a substantially higher risk of both recurrent thromboembolism and major bleeding compared to non-cancer patients, supporting guidelines that recommend LMWH over VKA in this population.
Prandoni et al. (2008) conducted a cohort in Acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) (n=12,744). Solid cancer vs. No malignancy was evaluated on Recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) at 3 months (HR 3.5, 95% CI 2.5-4.7). Solid cancer was associated with a significantly increased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism at 3 months compared to no malignancy in patients receiving vitamin K antagonists (adjusted HR 3.5).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: