Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the design of light-harvesting chromophores for use in dye-sensitized photoelectrosynthesis cells (DSPECs), surface binding to metal oxides in aqueous solutions is often inhibited by synthetic difficulties. We report here a systematic synthesis approach for preparing a family of Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes of the type [Ru(4,4'-R2-bpy)2(4,4'-(PO3H2)2-bpy)](2+) (4,4'(PO3H2)2-bpy = [2,2'-bipyridine]-4,4'-diylbis(phosphonic acid); 4,4'-R2-bpy = 4,4'-R2-2,2'-bipyridine; and R = OCH3, CH3, H, or Br). In this series, the nature of the 4,4'-R2-bpy ligand is modified through the incorporation of electron-donating (R = OCH3 or CH3) or electron-withdrawing (R = Br) functionalities to tune redox potentials and excited-state energies. Electrochemical measurements show that the ground-state potentials, E(o')(Ru(3+/2+)), vary from 1.08 to 1.45 V (vs NHE) when the complexes are immobilized on TiO2 electrodes in aqueous HClO4 (0.1 M) as a result of increased Ru dπ-π* back-bonding caused by the lowering of the π* orbitals on the 4,4'-R2-bpy ligand. The same ligand variations cause a negligible shift in the metal-to-ligand charge-transfer absorption energies. Emission energies decrease from λmax = 644 to 708 nm across the series. Excited-state redox potentials are derived from single-mode Franck-Condon analyses of room-temperature emission spectra and are discussed in the context of DSPEC applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashford et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: