The Talent LPS endograft demonstrates acceptable long-term performance for elective EVAR in high-risk patients with complex anatomy, though ongoing surveillance for migration and endoleaks remains essential.
PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term results in patients undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the Talent LPS endograft to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: Fifty patients (49 men; median age 72 years, range 54-89) were treated electively between 1997 and 2001 with the Talent LPS endograft chosen for various anatomical reasons, including short (< or =15 mm) aortic neck (32.5%), iliac ectasia (> or =18 mm) in at least 1 iliac artery (32%), angulated (30 degrees -60 degrees ) aortic neck (16%), large (> or =28 mm) aortic neck (6%), and tapered, reversed tapered, or bulging aortic neck (14%). A quarter of patients were preoperatively classified as unfit for AAA open repair, and 58% were high risk (ASA III or IV). The primary endpoints were immediate success, aneurysm-related and non-aneurysm-related mortality, secondary interventions, graft-related complications, graft migration (> or =5 mm), and structural failure. RESULTS: Implantation success was achieved in 96% (48/50). Four (8%) patients died within 30 days; in follow-up, the mortality rate was 51% over a mean 47.7+/-27.4 months (minimum of 5 years). Aneurysm-related mortality was 12% (6/50); 3 (6%) patients were converted. The overall reintervention rate was 16% (8/50). There were 9 (18%) endoleaks in 8 patients: 4 type I (2 proximal, 2 distal), 3 type II, and 2 type III. The migration rate was 4% (1 ruptured AAA, 1 endoleak). Individual cases of graft kinking and stent fracture occurred in this series. CONCLUSION: Despite the small population, trends in our results suggest that the Talent stent-graft performs well over the long term. Surveillance, especially with regard to migration and graft integrity, remains of great importance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coppi et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: