Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Measurements of the integrated intensities of the νO–H ... O, νO–H, and νC=O bands of acetic acid CH3COOH in the vapor phase (where H-bonded dimers are in equilibrium with non H-bonded monomers), together with measurements of the intensities of the corresponding bands in CH3COOD, have been performed at various pressures and temperatures. It has been found that the transition probability P O–H ... O for the 0 → 1 transition of the stretching motion νO–H ... O of the H atoms in the H-bonds of (CH3COOH)2 was 2 times greater than the corresponding probability νO–D ... O in (CH3COOD)2. This value was determined with a precision better than 10%. The ratio PC=O ... H/PC=O ... D of the transition probabilities for the νC=O ... H and νC=O ... D modes in (CH3COOH)2 and (CH3COOD)2 was found to be equal to 1.25, with a precision better than 10%. The same ratios were found in CD3COOH and CD3COOD. These results are quite puzzling and have not yet been interpreted (by comparison, the ratio P O–H/P O–D of the transition probabilities for the free νO–H and νO–D modes in the monomers was found to be equal to 1.3). This ``anomalous'' ratio P O–H ... O/P O–D ... O seems hardly to be understandable on the basis of anharmonicity considerations alone, and it is suggested, after a critical examination of the possible origins of this effect, that the H bonds are not adiabatic. This would imply that the motion of the H atoms along the H bonds induces electronic transitions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bournay et al. (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: