Three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) depth-averaged (DA) large-eddy simulations (LES) are presented for three different shallow-water flows involving large-scale horizontal structures: a mixing layer, the flow around a circular cylinder, and the flow in a groyne field. The results are compared with each other and also with experiments. In the 3D-LES, most of the energy-containing turbulent motions, including the larger subdepth-scale motions, are resolved, while in the 2D-DA-LES the effect of the 3D subdepth-scale turbulence is represented by a quadratic bottom-friction model and a simple eddy-viscosity model. In the case of the mixing layer, an additional stochastic backscatter model is necessary to account for the energy transfer from the subdepth-scale turbulence to the 2D structures in order to generate the latter. The 3D-LES results are generally in good agreement with the experiments, including the evolution of the horizontal structures. The much more economic 2D-DA-LES are somewhat less realistic in detail but also produce results that are generally of sufficient accuracy for practical purposes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hinterberger et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: