Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examines pollution-intensive industry relocation and its environmental costs under China's inter-provincial assistance program. We find that while the program significantly boosts economic output in recipient regions, it concurrently increases local pollution emissions, confirming the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for early-stage development. Longitudinal analysis of listed firms' cross-regional investments shows these environmental costs attenuate over time. Mechanism analysis reveals new polluting firms' entry as the primary driver of negative externalities. Heterogeneity tests demonstrate that eastern-assisted regions achieve lower emission intensity per unit output than central-assisted regions, attributable to scale economies. Our findings suggest institutional designs should account for local governments' strategic behavior to mitigate environmental externalities from industrial relocation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ming Xu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: