Key result
Adrenaline significantly increased the velocity of circumferential fibre shortening for a given end-systolic wall stress, whereas modest preload changes had no significant effect (P<0.005).
Why the study?
Do preload changes or adrenaline infusion affect the relation between left ventricular end-systolic wall stress and velocity of circumferential fibre shortening in ventilated patients?
Do preload changes or adrenaline infusion affect the relation between left ventricular end-systolic wall stress and velocity of circumferential fibre shortening in ventilated patients?
The relation between left ventricular end-systolic wall stress and velocity of circumferential fibre shortening is independent of modest preload changes but sensitive to inotropic stimulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports load-independent contractility assessment in ventilated patients; extends prior observations but leaves open randomized validation.
The relation between left ventricular end-systolic wall stress (ESWS) and the velocity of circumferential fibre shortening (Vcfs) was examined in four non-random groups with 12 patients each. In group A, preload was increased by the administration of hydroxyethylstarch 30 mL min-1. In group B, preload was reduced by administering nitroglycerine 4.0 +/- 0.8 mg h-1. A change in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure by 3 mmHg was taken to be the end point for preload manipulation. To assess a change in the relation between ESWS and Vcfs, patients in group C received adrenaline at an infusion rate of 4 g min-1. Patients in group D served as the controls. Geometric variables of ESWS and Vcfs were determined by transoesophageal echocardiography. A linear model was used to assess the relation between ESWS and Vcfs within each group by regression analysis, and analysis of covariance performed to detect significance of intragroup and intergroup differences (P < 0.005). No significant changes were found during preload intervention. With adrenaline, Vcfs increased significantly for a given ESWS. It is concluded that the relation between ESWS and Vcfs, in a multiple patient setting, is independent of modest preload changes and may have the potential to indicate inotropic effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greim et al. (1997) studied Ventilated patients (n=48). Preload manipulation (hydroxyethylstarch or nitroglycerine) and adrenaline vs. Control group was evaluated on Relation between left ventricular end-systolic wall stress (ESWS) and the velocity of circumferential fibre shortening (Vcfs) (p=<0.005). Adrenaline significantly increased the velocity of circumferential fibre shortening for a given end-systolic wall stress, whereas modest preload changes had no significant effect (P<0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: