Four experienced orthopaedic surgeons measured the acetabular angle of Sharp (AA) in 66 hips by using two methods. In the classic method (AA-c), the lateral margin of the acetabular roof was used as the landmark. In the modified method (AA-m), the lateral margin of the sourcil (subchondral bony condensation in the acetabular roof) was used as the landmark. Mean AA-c and AA-m measurements were 44.8° and 48.4°, respectively. Mean intraobserver variations of AA-c and AA-m were 1.8° and 2.1°, respectively. Mean interobserver variations of AA-c and AA-m were 2.1° and 2.6°, respectively. Means obtained using AA-c of normal and defective acetabular roofs were similar, but the difference between AA-m means of different acetabular roof types was significant. The authors conclude that both AA-c and AA-m were reliable measurement methods, but clinical use of AA-m would probably produce better understanding of the radiographic hip anatomy in dysplastic hips.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ağuş et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: