Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A new method is proposed for accurately differentiating between an effective recorded-track area and an erase band by making a correlative evaluation of the magnetic-pole density distribution. At each end of an effective track, there is an area where a magnetization transition phase-shift occurs. This phase-shift area causes interference between consecutive bits at high-density recording, and reduce the effective track width. Also, an erase band is formed just outside the effective track. Simulation showed that the phase-shift area and the erase band are affected by the recording field distribution and narrowing the gap length, and reducing the recording magnetic field can effectively reduce these areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsuchiya et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: