Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents and compares different approaches currently used to assess surface anomalies identified on a product. The common point between these methods is that they are based on a document presented in the form of a table, which is to help the inspector to assess the anomaly detected in a repeatable and reproducible way. We will present three types of table: criteria/level table, tree-like presentation table and an indexed table. As each of these tables presents certain limits when applied to the inspection of a product surface, we will describe the table proposed in order to help the inspector determine the intensity to attribute to the identified anomaly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baudet et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: