Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hydrogenic-function and Sturmian-function expansions are examined in both the Schr\"odinger and Faddeev formulations for three-body atomic problems. A detailed comparison of their convergence behavior is made. The difficulty of Sturmian-function expansion in accounting for the strong coupling between degenerate target states at excitation thresholds does not arise in the Faddeev formulation. The difficulty with the uncontrolled continuum contribution in the hydrogenic-function expansion, however, persists in both formulations. An estimation of the continuum contribution in the hydrogenic-function expansion is made for off-shell amplitudes which appear in the Faddeev formulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: