Ambient, naturally charged small ions (<2000 Da) were measured in Hyytiälä, Finland, with a mass spectrometer (atmospheric pressure interface time-of-flight, APi-TOF) and two mobility spectrometers (air ion spectrometer, AIS, and balanced scanning mobility analyzer, BSMA). To compare these different instrument types, a mass/mobility conversion and instrumental transfer functions are required to convert high-resolution mass spectra measured by the APi-TOF into low-resolution mobility spectra measured by the AIS and BSMA. A modified version of the Stokes-Millikan equation was used to convert between mass and mobility. Comparison of APi-TOF and BSMA results showed good agreement, especially for sizes above 200 Da (Pearson's R = 0.7–0.9). Below this size, agreement was fair, and broadening BSMA transfer functions improved the correlation. To achieve equally good agreement between APi-TOF and AIS, AIS results needed to be shifted by 1–1.5 mobility channels. The most likely cause was incorrect sizing in the AIS. In summary, the mass and mobility spectrometers complement each other, with the APi-TOF giving superior chemical information, limited to relatively small ions (<2.5 nm diameter), whereas the mobility spectrometers are better suited for quantitative concentration measurements up to 40 nm. The BSMA and AIS were used to infer a transmission function for the APi-TOF, making it possible to give quantitative estimates of the concentrations of detected chemical ions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ehn et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: