Key result
The Conjoint Committee for the Recognition of Training in Peripheral Endovascular Therapy has established criteria to assist Australian institutions with credentialing in radiology.
The article provides an Australian perspective on the criteria and future trends for hospital credentialing and accreditation in peripheral endovascular therapy.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Patients expect to receive safe, predictable and high-quality care delivered by competent professionals. Thus, it has become important to provide specific training in existing and new modalities and prove on-going clinical expertise. Hospital credentialing is the process by which the competence of a doctor is determined by the hospital management. In Australia, radiologists participate in a mandatory program of continuing professional development and are also required to maintain a logbook of procedures. The Conjoint Committee for the Recognition of Training in Peripheral Endovascular Therapy has been established to advise the respective subspecialty groups on the requirements for accreditation. This article examines some of the issues the committee has considered in preparing the criteria to assist institutions for the purposes of credentialing and gives an Australian perspective on future trends.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Australian credentialing criteria for peripheral endovascular therapy may inform local practice; leaves open need for outcome validation and broader adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Street et al. (2008) conducted a review in Credentialing in radiology. Credentialing and accreditation guidelines was evaluated. The Conjoint Committee for the Recognition of Training in Peripheral Endovascular Therapy has established criteria to assist Australian institutions with credentialing in radiology.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: