Key result
This is a study protocol for a Delphi consensus study aiming to identify risk factors and develop risk-specific surveillance strategies after endovascular aneurysm repair; no results are available yet.
Why the study?
Risk factors for adverse events after EVAR have been described, but there is no consensus on their comparative prognostic significance, use in risk stratification, and application in postoperative surveillance.
This study protocol outlines a Delphi methodology to develop an expert consensus-based risk stratification tool and tailored surveillance algorithms for patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair.
May support individualized post-EVAR surveillance; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
INTRODUCTION: Several risk factors for adverse events after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) have been described, but there is no consensus on their comparative prognostic significance, use in risk stratification and application in determining postoperative surveillance. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A scoping review of the literature was conducted to identify risk factors for adverse events after EVAR. Main adverse events were considered post-EVAR abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture and reintervention. Risk factors were grouped into four domains: (1) preoperative anatomy, (2) aortic device, (3) procedure performance and (4) postoperative surveillance. The Delphi methodology will be used to steer a group of experts in the field towards consensus organised into three tiers. In tier 1, participants will be asked to independently rate risk factors for adverse events after EVAR. In tier 2, the panel will be asked to independently rate a range of combinations of risk factors across the four domains derived from tier 1. A risk-stratification tool will then be built, which will include algorithms that map responses to signalling questions onto a proposed risk judgement for each domain. Domain-level judgements will in turn provide the basis for an overall risk judgement for the individual patient. In tier 3, risk factor-informed surveillance strategies will be developed. Each tier will typically include three rounds and rating will be conducted using a 4-point Likert scale, with an option for free-text responses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research Ethics Committee and Health Research Authority approval has been waived, since this is a professional staff study and no duty of care lies with the National Health Service to any of the participants. The results will be presented at regional, national and international meetings and will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. The risk stratification tool and surveillance algorithms will be made publicly available for clinical use and validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antoniou et al. (2022) studied Abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=50). Delphi consensus process was evaluated on Consensus on risk factors for adverse events after EVAR and risk-specific surveillance strategies. This is a study protocol for a Delphi consensus study aiming to identify risk factors and develop risk-specific surveillance strategies after endovascular aneurysm repair; no results are available yet.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: