Key result
A standardized teaching session marginally improved South African intern doctors' mean ECG interpretation accuracy from 60.1% to 65.8% (p < 0.001) and significantly increased their self-confidence.
Why the study?
Interpreting an ECG is challenging for junior doctors with proficiency gaps existing worldwide, prompting an evaluation of South African intern doctors' accuracy and self-confidence in identifying acute myocardial ischaemia, as well as the impact of an educational strategy.
Does a standardized ECG teaching session improve interpretation accuracy and self-confidence in identifying acute myocardial ischemia among South African intern doctors?
Does a standardized ECG teaching session improve interpretation accuracy and self-confidence in identifying acute myocardial ischemia among South African intern doctors?
A standardized teaching session significantly improved South African intern doctors' self-confidence in ECG interpretation, but had only a marginal and mixed impact on their accuracy in identifying acute myocardial ischemia.
Targeted ECG training may boost intern ischaemia detection; leaves open clinical outcome impact.
Background: Interpreting an electrocardiogram (ECG) is challenging for junior doctors, and proficiency gaps exist commonly worldwide. This study assessed interpretation accuracy and self-confidence of South African intern doctors in identifying acute myocardial ischaemia on an ECG and analysed the impact of an education strategy. Methods: This descriptive, quantitative study included a prospective analytical component using a standardised teaching session. All participants completed an ECG interpretation test and self-confidence questionnaire both before and after the teaching session. Descriptive statistics summarised demographics; data analyses included means, medians, modes, and individualised comparisons of pre- and post-teaching test scores and self-confidence. Results: One hundred and sixty-four interns were analysed. At baseline, interns demonstrated above-average accuracy (mean test score 60.1%) and most declared moderate insecurity with ECG interpretation. Post-teaching, accuracy improved marginally (mean test score 65.8%) (p < 0.001), and self-confidence improved drastically with most becoming moderately confident (p < 0.001). However, while there was a significant improvement in the recognition of four ischaemic and two non-ischaemic ECG patterns, the misinterpretation of one non-ischaemic ECG significantly worsened, and there was an insignificant impact on half of the ischaemic ECGs tested. Conclusion: Interns demonstrated above-average accuracy in identifying acute myocardial ischaemia on an ECG with moderate insecurity at baseline. While a teaching session improved self-confidence, its impact on accuracy was mixed. This highlights a need for ongoing training of South African intern doctors in ECG interpretation. Contribution: This study was the first to assess ECG interpretation accuracy and associated self-confidence of South African intern doctors, thereby offering a local perspective on this essential skill.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naidoo et al. (2025) studied ECG interpretation proficiency (n=164). Standardised ECG teaching session vs. Baseline (pre-teaching) was evaluated on Mean ECG interpretation test score (p=<0.001). A standardized teaching session marginally improved South African intern doctors' mean ECG interpretation accuracy from 60.1% to 65.8% (p < 0.001) and significantly increased their self-confidence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: