First-principles calculations predict 7.8% and 6.3% contractions of the outermost layer spacings of Ti(0001) and Zr(0001). Charge smoothing, slight at close-packed metal surfaces, cannot explain such large relaxations. Bond-order bond-length correlation is a more promising concept. Bonds to undercoordinated Ti or Zr should be unusually short, given the small ratio, {~}0.7, of dimer bond length to nearest-neighbor distance for these elements. {} 1996 The American Physical Society.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter J. Feibelman (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: