Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study an inverse problem for the Timoshenko beam model, which describes the transverse displacement u and cross-sectional rotation φ of an elastic beam, accounting for shear and rotary inertia. For a beam of length $ L > 0 $, with Young's modulus E, shear modulus G, density ρ, cross-sectional area A, moment of inertia I, and shear correction factor κ, the system under a source g(t)(f₁(x), f₂(x)) reads:$ {equation} \{ {aligned} {} & ρ A ∂^2 u/∂ t^2 - ∂/∂ ξ[AGκ(∂ u/∂ ξ - φ)] = g(t) f_1, \\ & ρ I ∂^2 φ/∂ t^2 - ∂/∂ ξ(EI∂ φ/∂ ξ) - κ AG(∂ u/∂ ξ - φ) = g(t) f_2. \ {aligned} . {equation} $We prove that, although the model involves both $ u $ and $ φ $, for known $ g ∈ C^1 $ the observation of $ u(t, x) $ on $ (0, T]×Ω_w $, where $ ∅ ≠ Ω_w ⊂ (0, L) $ is an open set, uniquely determines $ (f_1, f_2)∈ H⁻¹(Ω)^2 $ – an advantage in practice, for rotation is very difficult to measure. Numerical results show that, while the Timoshenko model is more accurate, the simpler Euler-Bernoulli model still yields satisfactory reconstructions beyond its formal range of validity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawano et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: