Key result
The porcine preclinical model demonstrated similar PFO prevalence and histopathology to humans, though porcine PFO tunnel length was significantly longer (12.0 vs 7.1 mm, P<0.0001).
The domestic swine PFO model shares identical prevalence and similar microscopic structures to humans, making it a useful preclinical model for evaluating interventional closure technologies, though differences in tunnel length must be accounted for.
Supports porcine PFO model for device testing; leaves open translation of tunnel length differences to human outcomes.
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated and standardized a Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) preclinical model in gross anatomic and histopathologic features. METHODS: We examined 150 necropsy-derived domestic porcine hearts, age 4-6 months for PFO prevalence, appearance, and size. Histopathologic preparations were standardized and processed identically to 24 post-mortem human hearts aged 16-62 years. A measurement scheme was developed for PFO atrial openings, tunnel length, and histopathologic features to compare porcine and patient hearts. RESULTS: PFO was found in 32 of the 150 porcine hearts (prevalence 21.3%). Twenty-five porcine PFO underwent standard characterization by tunnel length, and right, and left atrial orifice diameters. Logarithmic regression analysis between porcine PFO tunnel length and left atrial orifice area demonstrated a significant positive relationship (P = 0.0162, R(2) = 0.227). The porcine PFO tunnel length was significantly longer than in humans (12.0 +/- 4.0 mm vs. 7.1 +/- 3.1 mm respectively, P < 0.0001). Histopathologic comparison was made using serial sections perpendicular to the atrial septum and the tunnel long axis. Human and porcine PFO lesions demonstrated strong similarities in tissue cells, connective tissue, and matrix composition. CONCLUSIONS: PFO assessment was standardized in both macroscopically and histopathologically, with quantitative and qualitative comparisons feasible using a porcine preclinical model. PFO prevalence in domestic swine is identical to humans, and microscopic structures very similar to humans. The domestic swine PFO model appears useful to evaluate new interventional closure technologies due to comparability in microscopic features. Tunnel length should be carefully evaluated due to differences across pigs and patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hara et al. (2006) studied Patent Foramen Ovale (n=174). Porcine preclinical model vs. Human hearts was evaluated on PFO tunnel length (p=<0.0001). The porcine preclinical model demonstrated similar PFO prevalence and histopathology to humans, though porcine PFO tunnel length was significantly longer (12.0 vs 7.1 mm, P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: