Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper deals with the 17th century information explosion and its influence on scholarly reading behaviour.The invention of the printing press had increased drastically the amount of books and at the same time, the volume of knowledge.As a result, it became very difficult for researchers to embrace the full account of available science.Starting from the work of the French libertine Sceptic François de La Mothe le Vayer (1588Vayer ( -1672)), the analysis will focus on two major questions of 17th century research: The first question "Is the immense profusion of books instructive or rather confusing?"will be the basis for a second one: "Hasn't everything been said?Is it still possible to add something to this colossal knowledge?"
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sara Decoster (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 9 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: