This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Inserting a peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheter is a common health care procedure; however, risks include phlebitis, extravasation, and accidental dislodgement. Using evidence-based practices (EBPs) can reduce these risks. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to implement an evidence-based PIV catheter care bundle and a decision-making algorithm. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study design was used. A care bundle and an evidence-based decision-making algorithm were implemented on a medical unit. Outcomes included length of PIV catheter dwell time, phlebitis and other complications, and health professionals' adherence to the interventions. RESULTS: A total of 364 PIV catheters were assessed. PIV catheter dwell time decreased from 3.6 to 2.9 days ( P < .001), and phlebitis rates decreased from 14.8% to 4.9% ( P < .05). Health professionals' adherence increased from 84.3% to 91.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing EBPs can improve care provided to patients with PIV catheters.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hontoria-Alcoceba et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: