Objective: To evaluate the performance and screening value of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in low-risk pregnancies. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 60193 low-risk pregnancies over the last 5 years. Whole-genome sequencing of maternal plasma cell-free DNA was performed using next-generation sequencing. NIPT-positive results were confirmed using amniocentesis with karyotyping and/or copy number variation sequencing and chromosomal microarray analysis. Fetal outcomes were assessed using electronic medical records or telephone calls. Results: Overall, 598 (0.99%) NIPT-positive cases were identified. The distribution of chromosomal abnormalities included sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs; 55.85%), rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs; 20.40%), copy number variations (CNVs; 11.20%), trisomy 21 (T21; 6.86%), trisomy 13 (T13; 4.01%), and trisomy 18 (T18; 1.67%). A total of 572 (95.65%) patients with NIPT-positive results underwent amniocentesis, and 55.77% (319/572) cases were confirmed. The positive predictive values (PPV) for T21, T18, T13, SCAs, RAAs, and CNVs were 87.50%, 60.00%, 34.78%, 58.97%, 32.50%, and 69.70%, respectively, and the PPV for the trisomy was higher than that for the X-monomer in SCAs. NIPT-positive results for RAAs were common in T8, T10, T16 and T20, but T16 was the most common true positive result, accounting for 33.33% (13/39) of the cases. The termination rates of true-positive pregnancies were 100% (T21, T18 and T13), 79.49% (RAAs), 67.39% (CNVs) and 78.07% (SCAs). Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of genome-wide screening based on NIPT in low-risk pregnancies. Prenatal screening by NIPT has a high sensitivity and PPV. Moreover, it can greatly reduce invasive procedures and birth defects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: