Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have used density-functional methods including explicit spin–orbit corrections, to calculate the 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) chemical shifts of the tetrahalophosphonium cations PX4+ (X=F, Cl, Br, I). The agreement between theory and experimental literature data for PF4+, PCl4+, and PBr4+ is good. For PI4+, the calculations predict an extremely negative (high-field) shift of approximately −520 ppm, due to particularly large spin–orbit contributions from the four heavy iodine substituents, transmitted to the phosphorus nucleus by a very effective Fermi-contact mechanism. No experimental data were available for PI4+. We have, therefore, prepared the compounds PI4AsF6, PI4SbF6, PI4AlI4, and PI4GaI4 and recorded their solid-state 31P NMR spectra, both with and without magic-angle spinning of the sample. Using the noncoordinating AsF6− and SbF6− anions, the measured isotropic shifts are −519 and −517 ppm, respectively, in good agreement with the predicted extreme value for the isolated cation. In contrast, δ31P values of only −304 and −295 ppm are found for PI4AlI4 and PI4GaI4, respectively. The large deviation from the isolated-cation limit in the latter two compounds is probably related to significant I⋯I secondary bonding interactions, as found in the solid-state structure of PI4AlI4. The observed solid-state shift tensors are discussed. The present results disagree clearly with previous claims for the synthesis of PI5.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaupp et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: