mortality.It would simply mean that the cause of death would be different.Enabling people to live longer-perhaps for 20 years after retirement-would create economic problems no less great than at present.There would perhaps be the com- pensation that more and more of the un- employed could be used in looking after the aged.Or will you be proposing what the Archbishop of Canterbury hinted at when financial resources really dry up ?S ELLISON London NW6A cautionary tale SIR,-'Tis with a sense of grievous shock That one observed great Stephen Lock To perpetrate the awful sin Of leaving an unchecked reference in An article that bears his name.'This blot on editorial fame Though "For Debate" is clear to see At least to Belloc and to me: It was not Lundy's noble dad Who did advise the tearful lad It was his grandpapa the Duke -Sir, what a liberty you took!
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter O. Behan (1977) studied this question.