In this paper we quantitatively compare various electrostatic models, which describe the interaction of a polarized atomic force microscopy tip with a molecularly smooth and grounded substrate, with a large experimental data set collected at many different tip potentials. The model by Hudlet et al. [Eur. Phys. J. B 2, 5 (1998)] provides an excellent description of the experimental data for tip parameters (height H, cone half-angle θ₀, and tip radius R₀) close to their typical values, provided contributions from the cantilever body are included.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Law et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: