Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The conditions enabling the transition of surface-adsorbed hydrogen atoms into bulk metals are explored by comparing the response of chemisorbed H on Pd(100) and Ti(0001) single crystals to thermal activation in vacuum. Thermal desorption spectroscopy and ¹H(¹⁵N,αγ)¹²C nuclear reaction analysis reveal that heating causes H₂ desorption from Pd(100), whereas H atoms on Ti(0001) reversibly exchange between the surface and the Ti bulk with negligible desorption loss of H₂. A general model is proposed in which the competition between desorption and bulk absorption of surface hydrogen is, on one hand, kinetically determined by the activation energy for associative H₂ desorption relative to the effective energy barrier for H absorption. On the other hand, the thermodynamic possibility to dissolve the surface H atoms into the metal must be considered to consistently explain the opposite behavior of H on Pd(100) and Ti(0001). The first experimental estimation of the energy of surface adsorption, εₛ=-0.92 eV, for H/Ti(0001) is presented, in good agreement with theoretical calculations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilde et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: