Introduction: Prosodic focus marking plays a central role in conveying information structure, yet little is known about how Mandarin-speaking children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) use acoustic cues to signal contrastive focus in a tonal language. Methods: Prosodic focus marking plays a central role in conveying information structure, yet little is known about how Mandarin-speaking children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) use acoustic cues to signal contrastive focus in a tonal language. This study examined pitch, duration, and intensity in sentence-initial and sentence-final focus produced by 20 Mandarin-speaking children with ASD and 20 age- and sex-matched typically developing (TD) peers. Using picture-based prompts, children produced simple subject-verb-object sentences, and acoustic measures of focus words (sentence-initial subject and sentence-final object) and post-focus verbs were analyzed with linear mixed-effects models. Results: Children with ASD showed significantly higher pitch than TD children in sentence-final focus, with no group difference in sentence-initial focus. Duration ratio was significantly reduced only with high-tone verbs. Intensity ratio was lower in sentence-initial focus, but higher in sentence-final focus with high-tone verbs. In the post-focus region, children with ASD exhibited higher pitch than TD children for both high- and low-tone verbs, but showed larger duration ratio and lower intensity ratio only for low-tone verbs. Discussion: These findings suggest that children with ASD are not globally impaired in focus marking, but show patterns that vary with focus position and tonal context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: