Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
// Xiaohua Shi 1 , Huanli Duan 1 , Xuguang Liu 1 , Liangrui Zhou 1 , Zhiyong Liang 1 1 Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China Correspondence to: Zhiyong Liang, email: liangzhiyong1220@yahoo.com Keywords: combined small cell lung cancer, adenocarcinoma, epidermal growth factor receptor, KRAS, retinoblastoma protein Received: January 08, 2016 Accepted: April 11, 2016 Published: April 28, 2016 ABSTRACT There are 2 hypotheses regarding the mechanism underlying the adenocarcinoma (AD) to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) transition in patients receiving Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy: 1) AD gives rise to SCLC owing to the pressure of the TKI therapy, and 2) the SCLC coexists with the AD de novo, but is not detected in biopsy specimens of the heterogeneous tumor. In this study, we try to address this issue by examination the genetic alteration and protein expression profile between SCLC arising from AD, and SCLC in combined small cell lung cancers (CSCLC). In the former, the SCLC had the same genetic profile as the AD, and we strongly suggest that the transition was a consequence of TKI therapy. In the latter, genetic alterations and protein expression tended to differ between the NSCLC and SCLC components of the CSCLC. The results showed that EGFR and KRAS mutation were found in 1 but not both component of CSCLC, and the NSCLC component usually expressed the EGFR and RB1 proteins, whereas the SCLC component did not. This finding indicates that the NSCLC and SCLC components arose separately and that CSCLC are unsuitable for TKI therapy despite the presence of sensitive EGFR mutations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: