Key result
Regional anesthesia was safely administered to parturients with various valvular heart diseases, with no peripartum anesthetic complications observed during surgery or vaginal delivery.
Why the study?
Maternal heart disease is a major cause of mortality among parturients, motivating the characterization of valvular pathologies and comparison of different anesthetic approaches.
Does regional anesthesia provide safe peripartum outcomes in parturients with valvular heart disease?
Observational (n=220)
No
Does regional anesthesia provide safe peripartum outcomes in parturients with valvular heart disease?
Regional anesthesia appears safe and is recommended for parturients with compensated valvular heart disease during labor and delivery.
Supports regional anesthesia safety in valvular heart disease parturients; hypothesis-generating, requiring randomized confirmation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: Maternal heart disease is one of the major causes for mortality among parturients. In our study, we surveyed 220 patients with different valvular disorders who gave birth in our medical center in the years 2012-2018. The aim of this study was to characterize various valvular pathologies and compare the results of different anesthetic approaches. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the computerized system and file archive were searched for maternal valvular pathologies according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9). The women included in the study were defined as American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA)-II or more, who suffer from valvular heart disease. RESULTS: The most common pathology was mitral valve regurgitation (57.73% of all cardiac patients). Most women were defined as having mild insufficiency, and 82.68% had normal vaginal delivery. In 17.3% of patients who had cesarean section, the main type of anesthesia was neuraxial anesthesia (95.45%). The second most common pathology was tricuspid valve regurgitation (22.73%). Most patients (78%) had normal vaginal delivery, and epidural analgesia was used in 64.1%. A minority of cardiac patients in our study were patients with stenotic heart diseases, such as aortic stenosis, mitral stenosis and pulmonic stenosis (8.18%, 4.55%, and 1.36%, respectively). No complications were observed in the peripartum period. CONCLUSION: The use of regional anesthesia is recommended for all valvular pathologies without exception, as we observed no cases in which the severity of cardiac condition had not allowed the use of various types of regional anesthesia, for surgery or vaginal delivery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shatalin et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Valvular heart disease in pregnancy (n=220). Regional anesthesia vs. General anesthesia was evaluated on Peripartum anesthetic complications. Regional anesthesia was safely administered to parturients with various valvular heart diseases, with no peripartum anesthetic complications observed during surgery or vaginal delivery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: