Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A series of new indole derivatives (2-28) has been prepared in the search for novel 5-HT uptake inhibitors. These compounds were obtained by the condensation of N-(chloroalkyl) naphthalenesultam derivatives with the appropriate amine in presence of a base, at reflux of DMF or THF. The yields were moderate (12-56%), except for the piperazine derivative 20 (85%). The affinity of the compounds for uptake site and 5-HT2, alpha 1, and D2 receptors was measured. Some compounds were studied in vivo by their potentiating effect of 5-HTP-induced symptomatology. The most potent and selective (uptake, 5-HT2 versus alpha 1, D2 sites) compounds contain a 3-[(4-piperidinyl)methyl]indole moiety. 5-Fluoro-3-[(4-piperidinyl)methyl]indole itself (compound 1) displayed a high affinity for the uptake site but was devoided of in vivo activity. N-Methylation of this compound abolished the affinity. In contrast N-substitution by a two-carbon chain linked to a naphthalenesultam or related heterocycle led to compounds exhibiting high affinity for the uptake site. One of them, 1-[2-[4-((5-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)methyl-1- piperidinyl]ethyl]-5,6-dihydro-1H,4H-1,2,5-thiadiazolo[4,3,2- ij]quinoline 2,2-dioxide (compound 24), was found as active as fluoxetine in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malleron et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: