Key result
The five-dose vial Sabin strain-based inactivated polio vaccine demonstrated lot-to-lot consistency and noninferior seroconversion rates for types 1, 2, and 3 (98.02%, 94.07%, 98.77%) vs controls.
Why the study?
The safety, immunogenicity, and lot-to-lot consistency of Sabin strain-based inactivated polio vaccine in a five-dose vial presentation required evaluation.
Does a five-dose vial presentation of Sabin strain-based inactivated polio vaccine demonstrate safety, immunogenicity, and lot-to-lot consistency compared to conventional IPV or single-dose sIPV in infants?
RCT (n=1,572)
blinded
1:1:1:1:1
Does a five-dose vial presentation of Sabin strain-based inactivated polio vaccine demonstrate safety, immunogenicity, and lot-to-lot consistency compared to conventional IPV or single-dose sIPV in infants?
The five-dose vial presentation of Sabin strain-based inactivated polio vaccine is safe, immunogenic, and consistent across lots, offering a viable option for primary immunization in infants.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports five-dose sIPV vials for infant polio immunization; extends RCT evidence to multi-dose formats with lot consistency.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety, immunogenicity, and lot-to-lot consistency of Sabin strain-based inactivated polio vaccine (sIPV) in a five-dose vial presentation. METHODS: Stage I was an open-label safety observation, in which 72 healthy subjects (including 24 adults, children, and infants each) were given one or three doses of the five-dose vial sIPV; stage II was a randomized, blinded, and positive-control study, in which 1500 infants were randomized at the ratio of 1: 1: 1: 1: 1 into five groups to receive either three doses of the five-dose sIPV three lots, a conventional inactivated poliovirus vaccine, or a single-dose sIPV as controls, for primary immunization. Safety, immunogenicity, and lot-to-lot consistency were assessed. RESULTS: Among 1456 subjects who completed the primary immunization, the geometric mean titer ratios of types 1, 2, and 3 of each pair of lots were all within the equivalence criteria margin (0.67-1.50). The seroconversion rates of types 1, 2, and 3 in the combined test group were 98.02%, 94.07%, and 98.77%, respectively, which were noninferior to both control groups. The overall incidence of adverse reactions was 29.68% and erythema was the most common adverse reaction with incidences of 10.47%,9.33%, and 9.73% in the combined test group and control groups (P >0.05). CONCLUSION: The five-dose sIPV demonstrated good safety, immunogenicity, and lot-to-lot consistency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Polio immunization (n=1,572). Sabin strain-based inactivated polio vaccine (sIPV) in a five-dose vial vs. conventional inactivated poliovirus vaccine or single-dose sIPV was evaluated on Safety, immunogenicity, and lot-to-lot consistency. The five-dose vial Sabin strain-based inactivated polio vaccine demonstrated lot-to-lot consistency and noninferior seroconversion rates for types 1, 2, and 3 (98.02%, 94.07%, 98.77%) vs controls.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: