Do men and women in the same field develop different professional identities? This paper theoretically articulates and empirically explores a mechanism of such gendering: Self-conceptions may filter the identity traits emphasized by professional cultures so that only traits consistent with one’s self-conceptions are likely to be adopted into one’s professional identity. As such, systematic gender differences in self-conceptions may be relayed into gender variation in professional identities. Using longitudinal survey data of engineering students from four U.S. colleges, I find that four self-conceptions, two gendered and two gender-neutral, predict students’ adoption of four professional identity traits: problem-solving prowess, technological leadership, managerial/communication skills, and social consciousness. Two of these traits are gendered: Women are less likely than men to value technological leadership but more likely to value social consciousness. Suggesting possible career consequences of professional identities, I find that three professional identity traits predict students’ intentions to remain in engineering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erin A. Cech (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: