Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a view of HRD in the United Kingdom. It is a view that we are naturally partial to, that we are biased toward, so it serves our purposes. It is also a view that does not claim to be the whole truth, or even any part of the truth. It is a partial account recited by two people. If we can persuade others to believe it, then we might start to create a truth; together we might say, “This is what happened … this is why it happened … and this is what it means.” If enough people become partial to a view then we write history and our view becomes the truth. We suggest that our current view of HRD and our anticipation of its future profile is a function of our partiality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: