The diffusion of hydrogen in niobium with interstitial impurities was investigated by highresolution neutron spectroscopy for the system NbNₓHy with x=0.4 and 0.7 at.% and y=0.4 and 0.3 at.%, respectively. The neutron spectrum at larger scattering vector →Q consists of two parts: a narrow line centered at energy transfer ω=0 (width 0.1-3 {μ}eV) which is caused which is caused by hydrogen trapped on nitrogen atoms, and a broad component in the spectrum from hydrogen atoms which diffuse in the more or less undisturbed regions of the lattice. At small →Q, the spectral width is directly related to the self-diffusion constant. The experimental spectra, measured as a function of temperature and scattering vector, were interpreted by two theoretical models: (i) a two-state random-walk model (RWM) where the hydrogen alternates between a trapped state and a state of undisturbed diffusion. The RWM is characterized by the mean escape rate from the trap 1τ₀, and the capture rate on the traps 1τ₁; and (ii) an elastic-continuum model: the nitrogen-hydrogen interaction is treated in terms of the elastic strain field produced by the interstitial nitrogen and hydrogen atoms, and in terms of a short-range hard-core repulsion. This model uses the elastic parameters of the niobium and the interstitial nitrogen and hydrogen atoms. The hard-core radius r₀ is the only disposable parameter of the model. The RWM should hold as long as 2π→Q is larger than the linear dimensions of the trapping region. Model (i) yields a very good and consistent description of the measured spectra as a function of the concentration x, the temperature and the scattering vector. The resulting parameters τ₀ and τ₁ have the predicted behavior. In particular, τ₀ is independent of x, and τ₁^-1 is proportional to xD(T) where D is the self-diffusion constant in pure niobium. The trapping times are about two orders of magnitude larger than the mean rest time in pure niobium. Using a hard-core radius of r₀2.3 {}, model (ii) describes very well the experimental spectra at small and large →Q values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richter et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: