Key result
Skin prick testing with Triticum monococcum (einkorn) solutions elicited no reactivity (0%) compared to 43-100% reactivity with Triticum aestivum extracts in patients with WDEIA.
Why the study?
Does Triticum monococcum (einkorn) exhibit lower immunoreactivity compared to Triticum aestivum in patients with wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis?
Cross-Sectional (n=14)
Does Triticum monococcum (einkorn) exhibit lower immunoreactivity compared to Triticum aestivum in patients with wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis?
Triticum monococcum (einkorn) shows limited cross-reactivity with ω-5 gliadin and no skin prick test reactivity in WDEIA patients, suggesting potential for hypoallergenic bakery products.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Einkorn may be less allergenic in WDEIA; hypothesis-generating and should not yet alter practice.
Wheat [Triticum aestivum (T.a.)] ingestion can cause a specific allergic reaction, which is called wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA). The major allergen involved is ω-5 gliadin, a gluten protein coded by genes located on the B genome. Our aim was to study the immunoreactivity of proteins in Triticum monococcum (einkorn, T.m.), a diploid ancestral wheat lacking B chromosomes, for possible use in the production of hypoallergenic foods. A total of 14 patients with a clear history of WDEIA and specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) to ω-5 gliadin were enrolled. Skin prick test (SPT) with a commercial wheat extract and an in-house T.a. gluten diagnostic solution tested positive for 43 and 100% of the cases, respectively. No reactivity in patients tested with solutions prepared from four T.m. accessions was observed. The immunoblotting of T.m. gluten proteins performed with the sera of patients showed different IgE-binding profiles with respect to T.a., confirming the absence of ω-5 gliadin. A general lower immunoreactivity of T.m. gluten proteins with scarce cross-reactivity to ω-5 gliadin epitopes was assessed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Given the absence of reactivity by SPT and the limited cross-reactivity with ω-5 gliadin, T.m. might represent a potential candidate in the production of hypoallergenic bakery products for patients sensitized to ω-5 gliadin. Further analyses need to be carried out regarding its safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lombardo et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA) (n=14). Triticum monococcum (einkorn) solutions vs. Triticum aestivum (T.a.) extracts was evaluated on Skin prick test (SPT) reactivity. Skin prick testing with Triticum monococcum (einkorn) solutions elicited no reactivity (0%) compared to 43-100% reactivity with Triticum aestivum extracts in patients with WDEIA.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: