This paper proposes a straightforward criterion to warrant the displacement functions being used in the finite element approximation of circular arches. The criterion was established by studying the natural shape function, i.e. the exact solution of the deformed shape, of the circular arch element. The exact stiffness matrix [K]exact is derived from the natural shape and is confirmed to be the inverse of the well‐known flexibility matrix [F]exact in the curved beam theory. The present paper compares the inverse [K]−1 of the stiffness matrix derived from the assumed displacement function with the [F]exact. It is shown that the procedure also guarantees the implicit inclusion of rigid‐body modes in the pertinent stiffness matrix [K]. Case studies on typical approximate displacement functions assure the appropriateness as well as the ease of application of the proposed method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamada et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: