Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A series of phosphine-stabilized phosphoranimine cations [R(3)P x PR'(2)=NSiMe(3)](+), which can be regarded as derivatives of the proposed transient reactive intermediate [PR'(2)=NSiMe(3)](+) in the thermal condensation polymerization of phosphoranimines (R''O)PR'(2)=NSiMe(3) to form poly(alkyl/arylphosphazenes) [PR'(2)=N](n) at 180-200 degrees C, have been prepared. The bromide salts [R(3)P x PR'(2)=NSiMe(3)]Br [R' = Me ([6](+)), OCH(2)CF(3) ([8](+)); R(3)P = Me(3)P (a), Et(3)P (b), (n)Bu(3)P (c), dmpm (d, dmpm = dimethylphosphinomethane), dmpe (e, dmpe = dimethylphosphinoethane)] were prepared from the direct reactions between BrMe(2)P=NSiMe(3) (5) and Br(CF(3)CH(2)O)(2)P=NSiMe(3) (7) and the corresponding tertiary phosphines R(3)P or the diphosphines Me(2)P(CH(2))(n)PMe(2) (n = 1, 2). Cations of the type [6](+) and [8](+), with electron-donating and -withdrawing groups at the phosphoranimine phosphorus center, respectively, undergo facile phosphine ligand substitution with the strong N-donor 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) to yield the corresponding DMAP-stabilized salts [DMAP x PR(2)=NSiMe(3)]Br [R = Me ([9](+)), OCH(2)CF(3) ([10](+))]. Cations [6](+) with Br(-) anions are particularly labile: for example, [6a]Br slowly releases PMe(3), BrSiMe(3), and forms cyclic phosphazenes such as [Me(2)P=N](4). Anion exchange reactions between the salts [6b]Br or [8c]Br and AgOTf (OTf = CF(3)SO(3)) quantitatively afforded the corresponding and more stable triflate salts [6b]OTf and [8c]OTf. Phosphine ligand abstraction reactions with B(C(6)F(5))(3) were observed for the bromide salts [6b]Br and [8c]Br, which regenerated the phosphoranimines 5 and 7, respectively, and formed the adduct R(3)P x B(C(6)F(5))(3). In contrast, the triflate salts [6b]OTf and [8c]OTf were unreactive under the same conditions. X-ray structural analysis of the P-donor stabilized cations revealed longer P-P and P-N bond lengths and smaller P-N-Si bond angles for cations [6](+) compared to analogs [8](+). These structural differences were rationalized using the negative hyperconjugation bonding model. In addition, the (1)J(PP) coupling constants for the cations [6](+) observed by both solution and solid-state (31)P NMR are remarkably small (13-25 Hz), whereas those for [8](+) are substantially larger and positive (276-324 Hz) and are as expected for P(IV)(+)-P(V) systems. DFT studies suggest that the significant difference in (1)J(PP) couplings observed for [6](+) and [8](+) appears to be related to the electronegativity of the R' substituents at the phosphoranimine phosphorus center rather than the strength of the donor-acceptor P-P bond, which is slightly weaker in [6](+) relative to that in [8](+), as indicated by the X-ray data and reactivity studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huynh et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: