Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper examines the impact of parallel and series U-loop configurations on heat transfer in energy piles. Heating experiments were conducted on a set of four field-scale energy piles installed under a five-storey building, sharing identical dimensions (diameter = 0.9 m and length = 15 m) but varying numbers of U-loops (loops 1, 2, 3, and 4, in Piles 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). The investigation highlights the significance of fluid flow, temperature, U-loop quantity and configuration on heat transfer within solitary and grouped energy piles. In the parallel configuration, heat exchange occurs concurrently across all U-loops, proportional to the flow rate. Conversely, in the series configuration, the initial U-loops dominate heat exchange, with subsequent U-loops showing diminished effectiveness in contributing to the overall heat transfer. For identical flow rates in the individual U-loops of both configurations, the group of energy piles employing parallel U-loops exhibited higher heat exchange. The findings provide practical insights into optimising U-loop configurations to improve heat exchange between the pile and the surrounding soil under the studied boundary conditions. • Study examines heat transfer in energy piles with parallel and series U-loop designs. • Heating tests conducted on piles with identical size but varying U-loop quantities. • Factors like fluid flow, temperature, U-loop quantity and design impact heat transfer. • Parallel U-loops outperform series loops, where initial loops dominate heat transfer. • Findings help optimize U-loop configurations to improve heat transfer efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faizal et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: