Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The dioxomolybdenum(VI) complex [MoO2Cl2(L‐L)], containing the bidentate 1,4‐diazabutadiene ligand RN=C(Ph)−C(Ph)=NR [R = (CH2)3Si(OEt)3], was immobilised in the ordered mesoporous silica MCM‐41 by carrying out a grafting reaction in dichloromethane. The grafted material (3.3 wt.‐% Mo) was tested as a catalyst for the epoxidation of cyclooctene with tert‐butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) at 55 °C. Selectivity to the epoxide was very high and the observed kinetic profile was similar to that of the complex [MoO2Cl2(L‐L)] in the homogeneous phase. On recycling several times, some activity was lost from the first to second runs, but thereafter stabilised. Tethered complexes of this type were also prepared by a stepwise approach. The mesoporous silicas MCM‐41 and MCM‐48 were first treated with a toluene solution of the ligand L‐L under reflux. Before isolating the grafted materials, the silylating agent Me3SiCl was added to remove the residual Si−OH groups on the surface of the mesoporous materials. Oxomolybdenum species were subsequently introduced into the ligand‐silicas by pore volume impregnation of a solution of the complex [MoO2Cl2(THF)2] in CH2Cl2 at room temperature. The modified materials have been characterised by powder X‐ray diffraction, N2 adsorption, and solid‐state MAS NMR (13C, 29Si). Despite having lower metal loadings (1 wt.‐% Mo), the materials exhibited similar catalytic activities for the epoxidation of cyclooctene to that of the modified MCM‐41 with 3.3 wt.‐% of Mo. However, selectivities to the epoxide were lower. The MCM supported catalysts have also been tested for the epoxidation of cyclododecene and α‐pinene with TBHP. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2003)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nunes et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: