Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aminodiphenylphosphines are deprotonated by alkyllithium reagents to give the corresponding iminophosphide/phosphinoamide ions: lithium (neopentyl)(diphenylphosphino)amide ( 3 ), lithium (isopropyl)(diphenylphosphino)amide ( 4 ), and lithium (2,4,6-tri- tert -butylphenyl)(diphenylphosphino)amide ( 5 ). Derivative 3 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P 2 1 / c with Z = 4, a = 17.717(2) Å, b = 11.167(2) Å, c = 22.151(1) Å, β = 104.35(1)°, R1 = 0.064, and wR2 = 0.184 at −73 °C. Derivative 4 crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pna 2 1 with Z = 4, a = 20.557(4) Å, b = 10.475(2) Å, c = 17.982(4) Å, R1 = 0.044, and wR2 = 0.089 at −70 °C. Derivative 5 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C 2/ c with Z = 8, a = 47.256(6) Å, b = 9.126(2) Å, c = 18.246(2) Å, β = 104.67(1)°, R1 = 0.064, and wR2 = 0.165 at −73 °C. The solid-state structures of compounds 3 and 4 consist of approximately centrosymmetric dimers containing a Li 2 N 2 rhombus with each lithium ion bound by both anions through their nitrogen atoms and by an ether solvate to give approximate trigonal planar coordination geometry. In some cases, weak second-sphere dipole interactions are suggested by relatively short P···Li distances. The anions of 3 and 4 adopt cis conformations. In contrast, 5 is a monomer in the solid state. The anion of 5 adopts a trans conformation and the cation, which is bound by two ether solvates, exhibits approximately trigonal planar geometry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poetschke et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: