In examining NMR methods to assess orientation and fluxional motions of planar N-donor heterocyclic coordinated ligands (L's) in solution, we introduce the use of exchange-NOE NMR data as a powerful method for defining (i) the extent of L rotation about the metal-N bond, (ii) the direction of L rotation, and (iii) even the halves of C 2 -symmetrical L's that interchange during dynamic processes. The full value of the approach depends on a strategy in which the complexes studied are chiral and similar except that one has a lopsided L (Me 3 Bzm = 1,5,6-trimethylbenzimidazole in [Re 2 O 3 Cl 4 (Me 3 Bzm) 4 ] ( 1 )) and the other has a C 2 -symmetrical L (3,5-lut = 3,5-lutidine in [Re 2 O 3 Cl 4 (3,5-lut) 4 ] ( 2 )). Each Re is part of a nearly linear O Re−O−Re O grouping and has a “terminal” L (L t ) and a stacked L (L s ). The fluxional inversion of the two chiral dimers involves rotations of ∼180° about the Re−O−Re bonds and of ∼90° about all four Re−L bonds. The exchange-NOE data for 2 show that the half of L t away from the dimer center interchanges with the half of L s close to the center, with the L plane rotating past the O Re−O bonds, not the N−Re−Cl bonds. Thus, the exchange-NOE data help to establish the direction of L rotation. In 1, Me 3 Bzm t has the rare head-to-head (HH) orientation with respect to the partner. This partner Me 3 Bzm s stacks with the Me 3 Bzm s from the other Re in the common head-to-tail (HT) orientation. Compelling evidence that the predominant solution conformer of 1 has the HH,HT,HH structure includes unusual chemical shift dispersions and a strong interligand NOE cross-peak. This is the only case in which cis,bis imidazole-ring-ligated untethered ligands have been found to be predominantly HH in solution. This predominance can be attributed to the electrostatic attraction of the δ + N 2 C proton for the negative core of the molecule (bridging O, cis Cl on same Re, and two cis Cl's on the other Re).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alessio et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: