Armillaria mellea, A. ostoyae and A. bulbosa, but not A. tabescens, infected some of the heavily suppressed oaks that had been inoculated, whereas only A. mellea infected subdominant oaks. The same three species also infected suppressed Scots pines, but only A. ostoyae infected subdominant ones. Infections in stump roots of oak inoculated with A. mellea, A. ostoyae, A. bulbosa and A. tabescens were small unless roots had been weakened by severing; intact stump roots of pine were colonized more extensively than those of oak by the first three species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davidson et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: