Correspondence| January 01 1989 Structural and electrostatic differences between actinidin and papain account for differences in activity R W Pickersgill; R W Pickersgill Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar I G Sumner; I G Sumner Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar M E Collins; M E Collins Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar P W Goodenough P W Goodenough Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Author and article information Publisher: Portland Press Ltd Online ISSN: 1470-8728 Print ISSN: 0264-6021 © 1989 London: The Biochemical society1989 Biochem J (1989) 257 (1): 310–312. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj2570310 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Cite Icon Cite Get Permissions Citation R W Pickersgill, I G Sumner, M E Collins, P W Goodenough; Structural and electrostatic differences between actinidin and papain account for differences in activity. Biochem J 1 January 1989; 257 (1): 310–312. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/bj2570310 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsBiochemical Journal Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pickersgill et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: