Why the study?
Is the intravascular precipitation of fibrinogen responsible for the toxicity of heparinoids?
Is the intravascular precipitation of fibrinogen responsible for the toxicity of heparinoids?
The toxicity of heparinoids is primarily caused by intravascular precipitation of fibrinogen, and optimizing the molecular weight of dextran sulfate (5,300-6,700) minimizes severe reactions while maintaining anticoagulant activity.
Links fibrinogen precipitation to heparinoid toxicity; hypothesis-generating for dextran sulfate optimization pending human data.
Summary To demonstrate whether the intravascular precipitation of fibrinogen is responsible for the toxicity of heparinoid, the relation between the toxicity of heparinoid in vivo and the precipitation of fibrinogen in vitro was investigated, using dextran sulfate of various molecular weights and various heparinoids. 1. There are close relationships between the molecular weight of dextran sulfate, its toxicity, and the quantity of fibrinogen precipitated. 2. The close relationship between the toxicity and the precipitation of fibrinogen found for dextran sulfate holds good for other heparinoids regardless of their molecular structures. 3. Histological findings suggest strongly that the pathological changes produced with dextran sulfate are caused primarily by the intravascular precipitates with occlusion of the capillaries. From these facts, it is concluded that the precipitates of fibrinogen with heparinoid may be the cause or at least the major cause of the toxicity of heparinoid. 4. The most suitable molecular weight of dextran sulfate for clinical use was found to be 5,300 ~ 6,700, from the maximum value of the product (LD50 · Anticoagulant activity). This product (LD50 · Anticoagulant activity) can be employed generally to assess the comparative merits of various heparinoids. 5. Clinical use of the dextran sulfate prepared on this basis gave satisfactory results. No severe reaction was observed. However, two delayed reactions, alopecia and thrombocytopenia, were observed. These two reactions seem to come from the cause other than intravascular precipitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sasaki et al. (1964) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: