Key result
Intracoronary Ca2+ slightly augmented the intracellular Ca2+ recirculation fraction, whereas epinephrine did not, although both agents enhanced left ventricular contractility 2-3 times.
Why the study?
Does intracoronary Ca2+ and epinephrine affect intracellular Ca2+ recirculation fraction and total Ca2+ handling in canine left ventricles?
Does intracoronary Ca2+ and epinephrine affect intracellular Ca2+ recirculation fraction and total Ca2+ handling in canine left ventricles?
Intracoronary Ca2+ slightly augments Ca2+ recirculation fraction via the sarcoplasmic reticulum in canine left ventricles, whereas epinephrine does not, despite both enhancing contractility.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide mechanistic studies of Ca2+ handling in animals; leaves open relevance to human ventricular contractility.
We investigated the effects of intracoronary Ca2+ and epinephrine on the intracellular Ca2+ recirculation fraction (RF) and total Ca2+ handling in the left ventricle (LV) of the excised cross-circulated canine heart preparation. We analyzed LV postextrasystolic potentiation (PESP) following a spontaneous extrasystole that occurred sporadically under constant atrial pacing. All PESPs decayed in alternans and none decayed monotonically. We extracted an exponential decay component from the alternans PESP, determined its beat constant (taue), and calculated RF = exp(-1/taue). Increased intracoronary Ca2+ slightly increased taue and RF, but epinephrine did not change them, although both agents enhanced LV contractility 2-3 times. Neither Ca2+ nor epinephrine affected the sinusoidal decay of the alternans PESP. These results indicate that RF via the sarcoplasmic reticulum was slightly augmented by Ca2+, but not by epinephrine. We combined these RF data with LV Ca2+ handling O2 consumption data and obtained 40-110 micromol/kg as the total amount of Ca2+ handled in one cardiac cycle in the control and enhanced contractile states. These results indicate that this new LV-level approach seems to better the understanding of the Ca2+ mass dynamics responsible for the mechanoenergetics enhanced by inotropic interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Syuu et al. (1998) studied this question. Intracoronary Ca2+ and epinephrine vs. Control was evaluated on Intracellular Ca2+ recirculation fraction (RF) and total Ca2+ handling. Intracoronary Ca2+ slightly augmented the intracellular Ca2+ recirculation fraction, whereas epinephrine did not, although both agents enhanced left ventricular contractility 2-3 times.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: