This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Atomistic simulation calculations are used to predict the solution mechanisms and the defect cluster geometries of: M2+ dopant cations in Y2O3, M3+ dopant cations in CoO and M2+ dopant cations in SrTiO3. The interatomic potential parameters were derived by simultaneously fitting the properties of a range of mixed cation materials. The results suggest that although both solution enthalpies and cluster binding energies do scale with ionic radius, the relationships can be quite complex, materials specific and will not necessarily exhibit simple minima when the radius of the host cation equals the dopant cation, as described in previous studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grimes et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: