Key result
The 15-degree lithotomy-Trendelenburg position significantly increased central venous pressure (from 5.6 to 10.3 mmHg) and peak inspiratory pressure, while decreasing dynamic compliance.
Why the study?
Does the 30-degree lithotomy-Trendelenburg position induce significant respiratory and hemodynamic changes in healthy patients under general anesthesia?
Observational (n=20)
No
Does the 30-degree lithotomy-Trendelenburg position induce significant respiratory and hemodynamic changes in healthy patients under general anesthesia?
Absolute Event Rate: 10.3% vs 5.6%
p-value: p=<0.05
The steep lithotomy-Trendelenburg position induces moderate adverse hemodynamic and respiratory effects in healthy patients, highlighting the need for active monitoring in patients with compromised cardiopulmonary function.
May raise CVP and impair ventilation under anesthesia; hypothesis-generating for monitoring in cardiopulmonary disease, should not yet change practice.
intraoperative hemodynamic and respiratory changes that complicate anesthetic management. This study was performed to evaluate the effects of the lithotomy-Trendelenburg position on respiratory and hemodynamic changes with time passage during general anesthesia. Methods: Twenty patients undergoing anorectal surgery with general anesthesia were studied. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were measured before the lithotomy-Trendelenburg position (L) and 3 min (LT3), 6 min (LT6), 12 min (LT12), 30 min (LT30) and 60 min (LT60) after the 30 degree Trendelenburg position. The cardiac index (CI), stroke volume (SV), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), airway resistance (Raw) and dynamic compliance (Cdyn) were measured by a non-invasive cardiac output monitor. Results: Central venous pressure and peak inspiratory pressure were markedly increased from the lithotomy to the lithotomy-Trendelenburg position. Heart rate was slightly increased while SV, CI, SVR and MAP were decreased. No significant changes of the SV or CI were observed during surgery. The Cdyn was significantly decreased. Conclusions: The steep lithotomy-Trendelenburg position induces moderate adverse hemodynamic and respiratory effects in healthy patients. These findings indicate the need for more active hemodynamic and respiratory monitoring in patients with a compromised cardiopulmonary function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sae Yeon Kim (2002) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing anorectal surgery with general anesthesia (n=20). Lithotomy-Trendelenburg position (15 degrees) vs. Lithotomy position (baseline) was evaluated on Central venous pressure (CVP) at 5 minutes (p=<0.05). The 15-degree lithotomy-Trendelenburg position significantly increased central venous pressure (from 5.6 to 10.3 mmHg) and peak inspiratory pressure, while decreasing dynamic compliance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: